Lackey

Court of Claims

Lackey

191 Ct. Cl. 811, 1970 U.S. Ct. Cl. LEXIS 50, 1970 WL 3604

CourtUnited States Court of Claims

DecidedApril 3, 1970

DocketNo. 364-69

StatusPublished

This text of 191 Ct. Cl. 811 (Lackey) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Court of Claims primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Lackey, 191 Ct. Cl. 811, 1970 U.S. Ct. Cl. LEXIS 50, 1970 WL 3604 (cc 1970).

Pincite

Opinion

Military fay; limitation of actions. — Plaintiff seeks recovery of active duty pay as a Navy enlisted man from the date of his discharge due to unfitness on August 7,1944. This case [812]*812comes before the court on defendant’s motion to dismiss the petition and on plaintiff’s motion for oral argument of counsel. Upon consideration thereof, together with the response in opposition to defendant’s motion, without oral argument, the court concluded that plaintiff’s alleged claim accrued on August 7, 1944, and that his petition, filed in this court on August 29, 1969, is barred by the statute of limitations, 28 U.S.C. §2501. See Mathis v. United States, 183 Ct. Cl. 145, 391 F. 2d 938 (1968). On April 3, 1970, the court denied plaintiff’s motion, granted defendant’s motion, and dismissed the petition, as amended.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Military fay; limitation of actions. — Plaintiff seeks recovery of active duty pay as a Navy enlisted man from the date of his discharge due to unfitness on August 7,1944. This case [812]*812comes before the court on defendant’s motion to dismiss the petition and on plaintiff’s motion for oral argument of counsel. Upon consideration thereof, together with the response in opposition to defendant’s motion, without oral argument, the court concluded that plaintiff’s alleged claim accrued on August 7, 1944, and that his petition, filed in this court on August 29, 1969, is barred by the statute of limitations, 28 U.S.C. §2501. See Mathis v. United States, 183 Ct. Cl. 145, 391 F. 2d 938 (1968). On April 3, 1970, the court denied plaintiff’s motion, granted defendant’s motion, and dismissed the petition, as amended.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

191 Ct. Cl. 811, 1970 U.S. Ct. Cl. LEXIS 50, 1970 WL 3604, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lackey-cc-1970.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack