Home/New York Court of Appeals/Lack v. Canary

Lack v. Canary

501 N.E.2d 33, 68 N.Y.2d 849, 508 N.Y.S.2d 425, 1986 N.Y. LEXIS 20538
CourtNew York Court of Appeals
DecidedOctober 9, 1986
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 501 N.E.2d 33 (Lack v. Canary) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Lack v. Canary, 501 N.E.2d 33, 68 N.Y.2d 849, 508 N.Y.S.2d 425, 1986 N.Y. LEXIS 20538 (N.Y. 1986).

Opinion

Appeal transferred to the Appellate Division, Second Department, without costs, by the Court of Appeals sua sponte. A direct appeal does not lie where questions other than the constitutional validity of a statutory provision are involved (NY Const, art VI, § 3 [b] [2]; § 5 [b]; CPLR 5601 [b] [2]).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Dyszel v. Marks
6 F.3d 116 (Third Circuit, 1993)
Rose Dyszel and Robert Dyszel, H/w, Michele Dyszel and Michael Dyszel, H/w v. Rosie Marks, Defendant/third-Party v. Tim's Auto Service Tim Doe, Third-Party Michele Dyszel, Daniel Tumolo and Leslie Tumolo, H/w v. Andrew Brogan, III
6 F.3d 116 (Third Circuit, 1993)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
501 N.E.2d 33, 68 N.Y.2d 849, 508 N.Y.S.2d 425, 1986 N.Y. LEXIS 20538, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lack-v-canary-ny-1986.