Lacie Dee Pardun v. State
This text of Lacie Dee Pardun v. State (Lacie Dee Pardun v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order entered February 3, 2017
In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-16-00792-CR
LACIE DEE PARDUN, Appellant
V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
On Appeal from the 366th Judicial District Court Collin County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 366-83652-2015
ORDER Appellant’s brief was due November 5, 2016. By postcard dated November 8, 2016, we
notified appellant the brief was overdue and directed her to file the brief and an extension motion
within ten days. On November 16, 2016, appellant filed a motion to extend time which we
granted, extending the due date to December 5, 2016. Appellant filed another motion to extend
time, making her brief due January 6, 2017. To date, no brief has been filed and we have had no
communication from appellant.
Therefore, we ORDER the trial court to conduct a hearing to determine why appellant’s
brief has not been filed. Specifically, the trial court shall make appropriate findings and
recommendations and determine whether appellant desires to prosecute the appeal, whether
appellant is indigent, or if not indigent, whether retained counsel has abandoned the appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(b). If the trial court cannot obtain appellant’s presence at the hearing, the
trial court shall conduct the hearing in appellant’s absence. See Meza v. State, 742 S.W.2d 708
(Tex. App.–Corpus Christi 1987, no pet.) (per curiam). If appellant is indigent, the trial court is
ORDERED to take such measures as may be necessary to assure effective representation, which
may include appointment of new counsel.
We ORDER the trial court to transmit a record of the proceedings, which shall include
written findings and recommendations, to this Court within THIRTY DAYS of the date of this
order.
This appeal is ABATED to allow the trial court to comply with the above order. The
appeal shall be reinstated thirty days from the date of this order or when the findings are
received, whichever is earlier.
/s/ ADA BROWN JUSTICE
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Lacie Dee Pardun v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lacie-dee-pardun-v-state-texapp-2017.