Lachmann v. Metropolis Bath Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Lachmann v. Metropolis Bath Co.

232 A.D. 778

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedFebruary 15, 1931

StatusPublished

This text of 232 A.D. 778 (Lachmann v. Metropolis Bath Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Lachmann v. Metropolis Bath Co., 232 A.D. 778 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1931).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgment and order reversed upon the law and a new trial granted, costs to abide the event. In our opinion the trial court committed prejudicial errors in the charge to the jury appearing at folios 320, 326, 330, 340, 341, 342, 343, 345, 347 and 351, and by reason thereof the plaintiff was deprived of a fair and impartial trial. Young, Hagarty, Scudder and Tompkins, JJ., concur; Lazansky, P. J., concurs in result.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment and order reversed upon the law and a new trial granted, costs to abide the event. In our opinion the trial court committed prejudicial errors in the charge to the jury appearing at folios 320, 326, 330, 340, 341, 342, 343, 345, 347 and 351, and by reason thereof the plaintiff was deprived of a fair and impartial trial. Young, Hagarty, Scudder and Tompkins, JJ., concur; Lazansky, P. J., concurs in result.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

232 A.D. 778, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lachmann-v-metropolis-bath-co-nyappdiv-1931.