LaCharles Curtis v. the State of Texas
This text of LaCharles Curtis v. the State of Texas (LaCharles Curtis v. the State of Texas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In The Court of Appeals Seventh District of Texas at Amarillo
No. 07-25-00088-CR
LACHARLES CURTIS, APPELLANT
V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE
On Appeal from the 364th District Court Lubbock County, Texas Trial Court No. DC-2025-CR-0276, Honorable William R. Eichman II, Presiding
July 15, 2025 ORDER OF ABATEMENT AND REMAND Before QUINN, C.J., and PARKER and YARBROUGH, JJ.
Appellant, LaCharles Curtis, appeals his conviction for tampering with or
fabricating physical evidence1 and sentence to twenty years of confinement. Appellant’s
brief was originally due May 1, 2025, but we granted Appellant’s appointed counsel two
extensions to file a brief due to counsel’s caseload. By letter of June 24, 2025, we
admonished Appellant’s counsel that failure to file a brief by July 2 could result in the
1 See TEX. PENAL CODE ANN. § 37.09(c). appeal being abated and the cause remanded to the trial court for further proceedings
without further notice. On July 10, 2025, Appellant’s counsel filed a third motion
requesting a thirty-day extension to file a brief.
In the interest of conservation of judicial resources, we deny Appellant’s third
motion for extension, abate the appeal, and remand the cause to the trial court for further
proceedings. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(b)(2), (3). Upon remand, the trial court shall
determine the following:
1. whether Appellant still desires to prosecute the appeal;
2. whether Appellant is indigent;
3. why a timely appellate brief has not been filed on behalf of Appellant;
4. whether Appellant’s counsel has abandoned the appeal;
5. whether Appellant has been denied the effective assistance of counsel;
6. whether new counsel should be appointed; and
7. if Appellant desires to continue the appeal, the date the Court may expect
Appellant’s brief to be filed.
The trial court is also directed to enter such orders necessary to address the
aforementioned questions. So too shall it include its findings on those matters in a
supplemental record and cause that record to be filed with this Court by September 2,
2025. If it is determined that Appellant desires to proceed with the appeal, is indigent,
and has been denied the effective assistance of counsel, the trial court may appoint new
counsel; the name, address, email address, phone number, and state bar number of any
newly appointed counsel shall be included in the aforementioned findings.
2 Should Appellant’s counsel file a brief on or before the date the trial court acts per
our directive, he shall immediately notify the trial court of the filing, in writing, whereupon
the trial court shall not be required to take any further action.
It is so ordered.
Per Curiam
Do not publish.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
LaCharles Curtis v. the State of Texas, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lacharles-curtis-v-the-state-of-texas-texapp-2025.