LaChance v. Florida Power & Light Co.
520 So. 2d 330, 1988 WL 15489
Opinion
Affirmed. See Gordon v. Gordon, 59 So.2d 40 (Fla.), cert. denied, 344 U.S. 878, 73 S.Ct. 165, 97 L.Ed. 680 (1952); Thomson v. Petherbridge, 472 So.2d 773, 775 (Fla. 1st DCA 1985); Pumo v. Pumo, 405 So.2d 224, 226 (Fla. 3d DCA), review denied, 412 So.2d 469 (Fla.1981); State Road Dep’t v. Lewis, 156 So.2d 862 (Fla. 1st DCA 1963), aff'd in part, rev’d in part, 170 So.2d 817 (Fla.1964).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
LaChance v. Florida Power & Light Co., 520 So. 2d 330, 1988 WL 15489 (Fla. Ct. App. 1988).
520 So. 2d 330 (LaChance v. Florida Power & Light Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
State Road Department v. Lewis
170 So. 2d 817 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1964)
Gordon v. Gordon
59 So. 2d 40 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1952)
Pumo v. Pumo
405 So. 2d 224 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1981)
Thomson v. Petherbridge
472 So. 2d 773 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1985)
State Road Department v. Lewis
156 So. 2d 862 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1963)