LaChance Crutchfield v. State
Opinion
FILED IN COURT OF APPEALS 12th Court ofAppeals Distort
TYLER T IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEjAKSVTHY S. LU OF TEXAS
NO. PD-0348-13
LACHANCE CRUTCHFIELD, Appellant
v.
THE STATE OF TEXAS
ON APPELLANT'S PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW FROM TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS HENDERSON COUNTY
Per curiam. Keasler and HERVEY, JJ., dissent.
ORDER
The petition for discretionary review violates Rules of Appellate Procedure
68.4(i) & 9.4(i)(2)(D) because it does not contain a copy of the opinion of the court of
appeals and the petition exceeds the proper length.
The petition is struck. See Rule of Appellate Procedure 68.6.
The petitioner may redraw the petition. The redrawn petition and copies must
be filed in the Court of Criminal Appeals within thirty days after the date of this order.
Filed: July 24, 2013 Do not publish
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
LaChance Crutchfield v. State (LaChance Crutchfield v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.