Lach v. Robb

Third Circuit

Lach v. Robb

857 F.2d 1464, 1988 WL 91914

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit

DecidedAugust 2, 1988

Docket88-3142

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 857 F.2d 1464 (Lach v. Robb) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Lach v. Robb, 857 F.2d 1464, 1988 WL 91914 (3d Cir. 1988).

Pincite

Opinion

857 F.2d 1464

49 Ed. Law Rep. 489

Lach (Lois P.), Estate of Lach (Ronald T., Jr.)
v.
Robb (Edward Palmer), Kyle (George Parkinson), Crago (Miles
Jackson), Watkins (John P.), California University of
Pennsylvania, Encapera (James), Rapp (Charles), Dochinez
(Joseph), Borough of California, California Bottling Company

NO. 88-3142

United States Court of Appeals,
Third Circuit.

AUG 02, 1988

Appeal From: W.D.Pa.,

Teitelbaum, J.,

679 F.Supp. 508

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI