Lacey v. Sanford
163 F.2d 876
This text of 163 F.2d 876 (Lacey v. Sanford) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Lacey v. Sanford, 163 F.2d 876 (5th Cir. 1947).
Opinion
Claiming that he was denied the assistance of counsel, appellant applied for a writ of habeas corpus. The district judge, after a full hearing, denied the writ. Appellant is here claiming error. The record fully supports the finding of the district judge that appellant was not denied due process.
The order denying the writ is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
163 F.2d 876, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lacey-v-sanford-ca5-1947.