Lacefield v. State

1926 OK CR 167, 245 P. 70, 34 Okla. Crim. 152, 1926 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 155
CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma
DecidedApril 24, 1926
DocketNo. A-5484.
StatusPublished

This text of 1926 OK CR 167 (Lacefield v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Lacefield v. State, 1926 OK CR 167, 245 P. 70, 34 Okla. Crim. 152, 1926 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 155 (Okla. Ct. App. 1926).

Opinion

DOYLE, J.

On information charging that he did unlawfully convey intoxicating liquor, plaintiff in error, Lenton Lacefield, was tried and found guilty, and, in accordance with the verdict of the jury, was sentenced to pay a fine of $50 and to be confined in the county jail for 30 days. From the judgment he appeals, and assigns as error that the verdict is contrary to the law and the evidence, and that the court erred in the instructions to the jury, and erred in refusing requested instructions.

D. D. Mauldin, constable, and S. E. Mauldin, as witnesses for the state, testified that they saw the defendant driving on the highway in Hughes county towards the town of Stuart, and just before they met him he broke a one-half gallon jar which he was carrying in his car, and when he smashed it they picked up a part of the broken jar and found that it contained corn whisky.

The defendant, as a witness in his own behalf, testified that he found the whisky on the mountain about half a mile north of the iron post, and put it in his car, and when he saw the officers he broke the jar.

*153 On his own statement, the defendant is guilty as charged, and, the jury having fixed the minimum punishment, it would serve no useful purpose to review the instructions excepted to.

The judgment of the trial court is therefore affirmed.

BESSEY, P. J., and EDWARDS, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1926 OK CR 167, 245 P. 70, 34 Okla. Crim. 152, 1926 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 155, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lacefield-v-state-oklacrimapp-1926.