Lace v. Schoenhalss

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Lace v. Schoenhalss

68 N.W. 395, 93 Wis. 665, 1896 Wisc. LEXIS 107

DecidedSeptember 22, 1896

StatusPublished

This text of 68 N.W. 395 (Lace v. Schoenhalss) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Wisconsin Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Lace v. Schoenhalss, 68 N.W. 395, 93 Wis. 665, 1896 Wisc. LEXIS 107 (Wis. 1896).

Pincite

Opinion

Winslow, J.

This is an action of foreclosure of a mortgage upon real estate. The trial court found, among other things, that the plaintiff was not in fact the real owner of the mortgage; that one Ullrich was the true owner thereof; and that he had received payment in full therefor; and judgment was entered dismissing the complaint. There was sufficient competent evidence upon which to base these findings, and the judgment must therefore be affirmed.

By the Court.— Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Winslow, J.

This is an action of foreclosure of a mortgage upon real estate. The trial court found, among other things, that the plaintiff was not in fact the real owner of the mortgage; that one Ullrich was the true owner thereof; and that he had received payment in full therefor; and judgment was entered dismissing the complaint. There was sufficient competent evidence upon which to base these findings, and the judgment must therefore be affirmed.

By the Court.— Judgment affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

68 N.W. 395, 93 Wis. 665, 1896 Wisc. LEXIS 107, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lace-v-schoenhalss-wis-1896.