Lacaze v. Atkins

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Lacaze v. Atkins

158 So. 876

CourtLouisiana Court of Appeal

DecidedFebruary 5, 1935

DocketNo. 4908.

StatusPublished

This text of 158 So. 876 (Lacaze v. Atkins) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Louisiana Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Lacaze v. Atkins, 158 So. 876 (La. Ct. App. 1935).

Pincite

Opinion

DREW, Judge.

These two cases were consolidated for the purpose of trial below with the case of M. S. and Lula Davis et al. v. E. E. Lacaze, which case was appealed to the Supreme Court of the state and bears No. 329111 on the docket of the Supreme Court of the state of Louisiana. 158 So. 626.

The three cases involve a similar state of facts, and it is agreed by counsel for both appellant and appellee that the decis'on of the Supreme Court in the above-numbered and styled ease, in which the judgment of the lower court was affirmed, is conclusive of the issues in the cases at bar.

Therefore, for the reasons given in the case of M. S. and Lula Davis et al. v. E. E. Lacaze, No. 32911 on the docket of the Supreme Court of the state of Louisiana, decided January 7, 1935, the decisions of the lower court in these two cases are affirmed, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

DREW, Judge.

These two cases were consolidated for the purpose of trial below with the case of M. S. and Lula Davis et al. v. E. E. Lacaze, which case was appealed to the Supreme Court of the state and bears No. 329111 on the docket of the Supreme Court of the state of Louisiana. 158 So. 626.

The three cases involve a similar state of facts, and it is agreed by counsel for both appellant and appellee that the decis'on of the Supreme Court in the above-numbered and styled ease, in which the judgment of the lower court was affirmed, is conclusive of the issues in the cases at bar.

Therefore, for the reasons given in the case of M. S. and Lula Davis et al. v. E. E. Lacaze, No. 32911 on the docket of the Supreme Court of the state of Louisiana, decided January 7, 1935, the decisions of the lower court in these two cases are affirmed, with costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

158 So. 876, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lacaze-v-atkins-lactapp-1935.