Labriola v. Lawson

Missouri Court of Appeals

Labriola v. Lawson

412 S.W.3d 294, 2013 Mo. App. LEXIS 840, 2013 WL 3776993

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided July 16, 2013·No. No. ED 98574·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Rolland Labriola appeals the trial court’s judgment in favor of K & K Supply, Inc. (“K & K”) on his claim for res [295] ipsa loquitur after granting K & K’s motion for directed verdict at the close of Labriola’s case. Labriola also appeals the judgment entered upon the jury’s verdict in favor of William Wicker on Labriola’s claim of negligence. We affirm.

An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed under Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Rolland Labriola appeals the trial court’s judgment in favor of K & K Supply, Inc. (“K & K”) on his claim for res [295] ipsa loquitur after granting K & K’s motion for directed verdict at the close of Labriola’s case. Labriola also appeals the judgment entered upon the jury’s verdict in favor of William Wicker on Labriola’s claim of negligence. We affirm.

An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed under Rule 84.16(b).

Labriola v. Lawson, 412 S.W.3d 294, 2013 Mo. App. LEXIS 840, 2013 WL 3776993 (Mo. Ct. App. 2013).

Pincite

412 S.W.3d 294 (Labriola v. Lawson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.