Labrada v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Labrada v. State

589 So. 2d 468, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 11966, 1991 WL 253826

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedDecember 3, 1991

DocketNo. 91-636

StatusPublished

This text of 589 So. 2d 468 (Labrada v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Labrada v. State, 589 So. 2d 468, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 11966, 1991 WL 253826 (Fla. Ct. App. 1991).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We find no error in any of the appellant’s points on appeal of his convictions for attempted burglary, burglary, petty theft, and criminal mischief, Jackson v. State, 522 So.2d 802 (Fla.1988), cert. denied 488 U.S. 871, 109 S.Ct. 183, 102 L.Ed.2d 153; Davis v. State, 461 So.2d 67 (Fla.1984) cert. denied 473 U.S. 913, 105 S.Ct. 3540, 87 L.Ed.2d 663; State v, DiGuilio, 491 So.2d 1129 (Fla.1986); Zarate v. State, 466 So.2d 1176 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985); Corneiro v. Solomon, 450 So.2d 599 (Fla. 3d DCA 1984), except that as to the adjudication of guilt for criminal mischief in the first degree, which error was admitted to by the state. We agree, and by this opinion amend said adjudication of guilt of a second degree misdemeanor.

Affirmed as modified.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We find no error in any of the appellant’s points on appeal of his convictions for attempted burglary, burglary, petty theft, and criminal mischief, Jackson v. State, 522 So.2d 802 (Fla.1988), cert. denied 488 U.S. 871, 109 S.Ct. 183, 102 L.Ed.2d 153; Davis v. State, 461 So.2d 67 (Fla.1984) cert. denied 473 U.S. 913, 105 S.Ct. 3540, 87 L.Ed.2d 663; State v, DiGuilio, 491 So.2d 1129 (Fla.1986); Zarate v. State, 466 So.2d 1176 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985); Corneiro v. Solomon, 450 So.2d 599 (Fla. 3d DCA 1984), except that as to the adjudication of guilt for criminal mischief in the first degree, which error was admitted to by the state. We agree, and by this opinion amend said adjudication of guilt of a second degree misdemeanor.

Affirmed as modified.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

589 So. 2d 468, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 11966, 1991 WL 253826, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/labrada-v-state-fladistctapp-1991.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack