Labowitz v. Solomon
This text of 4 Misc. 624 (Labowitz v. Solomon) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering City of New York Municipal Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The cause of action, pleadings and evidence herein, are almost identical with those in Labowitz v. Frankfort and Spero, ante, page 275, and the same questions of fact and law arose upon the trial herein. For the reasons stated in the opinions this day filed in Labowitz v. Frankfort and Spero, ante, page 275, the judgment and order appealed from must be affirmed, with costs to the respondent.
Fitzsimons, J., concurs.
Judgment and order affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
4 Misc. 624, 23 N.Y.S. 1040, 53 N.Y. St. Rep. 528, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/labowitz-v-solomon-nynyccityct-1893.