Laborers I.U.N.A. Local No. 333 v. New York State Organized Crime Task Force

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Laborers I.U.N.A. Local No. 333 v. New York State Organized Crime Task Force

81 A.D.2d 1037, 440 N.Y.S.2d 119, 1981 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11802

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 27, 1981

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 81 A.D.2d 1037 (Laborers I.U.N.A. Local No. 333 v. New York State Organized Crime Task Force) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Laborers I.U.N.A. Local No. 333 v. New York State Organized Crime Task Force, 81 A.D.2d 1037, 440 N.Y.S.2d 119, 1981 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11802 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1981).

Pincite

Opinion

— Order unanimously reversed, without costs, and application denied. Memorandum: Special Term erred in quashing a subpoena duces tecum issued by appellants to Marine Midland Bank directing the production of bank records [1038]*1038concerning deposits and other financial transactions of respondents. As depositors respondents have no legitimate expectation of privacy and no cognizable Fourth Amendment interest in such bank records and, therefore, lack standing to challenge the subpoena (see United States v Miller, 425 US 435, 440-445; Matter of Cappetta, 42 NY2d 1066, affg 57 AD2d 596, affg 89 Misc 2d 943; Matter of Shapiro v Chase Manhattan Bank, N.A., 53 AD2d 542; Cunningham & Earning v Nadjari, 53 AD2d 520; Matter of Democratic County Committee of Bronx County v Nadjari, 52 AD2d 70). (Appeal from order of Onondaga Supreme Court — quash subpoena.) Present — Dillon, P.J., Cardamone, Hancock, Jr., Denman and Schnepp, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— Order unanimously reversed, without costs, and application denied. Memorandum: Special Term erred in quashing a subpoena duces tecum issued by appellants to Marine Midland Bank directing the production of bank records [1038]*1038concerning deposits and other financial transactions of respondents. As depositors respondents have no legitimate expectation of privacy and no cognizable Fourth Amendment interest in such bank records and, therefore, lack standing to challenge the subpoena (see United States v Miller, 425 US 435, 440-445; Matter of Cappetta, 42 NY2d 1066, affg 57 AD2d 596, affg 89 Misc 2d 943; Matter of Shapiro v Chase Manhattan Bank, N.A., 53 AD2d 542; Cunningham & Earning v Nadjari, 53 AD2d 520; Matter of Democratic County Committee of Bronx County v Nadjari, 52 AD2d 70). (Appeal from order of Onondaga Supreme Court — quash subpoena.) Present — Dillon, P.J., Cardamone, Hancock, Jr., Denman and Schnepp, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

81 A.D.2d 1037, 440 N.Y.S.2d 119, 1981 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11802, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/laborers-iuna-local-no-333-v-new-york-state-organized-crime-task-nyappdiv-1981.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack