Laborde v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp.

88 F. App'x 811
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
DecidedMarch 8, 2004
Docket03-31026
StatusUnpublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 88 F. App'x 811 (Laborde v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Laborde v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp., 88 F. App'x 811 (5th Cir. 2004).

Opinion

REYNALD G. GARZA, Circuit Judge. 1

In this appeal, we review the district court’s decision granting Defendants—Appellees’, Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corporation, Philip Morris Incorporated, and R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Company, application for taxation of costs.

Appellants argue that the application for taxation of costs should have been denied because Uniform Local Civil Rule 54.3 requires that the application be filed within 30 days of entry of a final judgment, and Appellees’ application was filed 31 days after the entry of judgment. However, we agree with the district court and find that the application was timely filed.

Uniform Local Civil Rule 54.3 actually requires that an application for taxation of costs be filed 30 days after receiving notice of entry of judgment. The district court entered judgment on May 20, 2003. As required by FED. R. CIV. P 77(d), the district clerk served the notice of entry of judgment by mail and facsimile the same day in the manner provided for in Rules 5(b)(2)(B) and (D). Because the notice of entry of judgment was served by mail and facsimile, FED. R. CIV. P. 6(e) granted Appellees three additional days in which to file their application for taxation of costs. The application was filed on June 20, 2003, 31 days after judgment was entered. Thus, it was timely.

For the foregoing reasons, the judgment of the district court is affirmed.

1

. Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Abels v. Ungarino and Eckert, LLC
951 So. 2d 318 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 2006)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
88 F. App'x 811, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/laborde-v-brown-williamson-tobacco-corp-ca5-2004.