Laboratory Corporation of America v. Robert Ortiz and St. Raphael Medical Clinic, Inc.

• Court: Court of Appeals of Texas
• Decided: June 29, 2006
• Docket: 01-05-00914-CV
• Status: Published

Opinion

Opinion issued June 29, 2006

In The

Court of Appeals

For The

First District of Texas

____________

NO. 01-05-00914-CV

LABORATORY CORPORATION OF AMERICA, Appellant

V.

ROBERT ORTIZ AND ST. RAPHAEL MEDICAL CLINIC, INC., Appellees

---

On Appeal from the 113th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 0552506

---

MEMORANDUM OPINION

          This is an interlocutory appeal from an order granting a temporary injunction. See Tex. Civ. Prac. & Rem. Code Ann. § 51.014(a)(4) (Vernon Supp. 2005).

          On May 5, 2006, upon learning that the trial court had set aside the temporary-injunction order from which appeal was taken, this Court issued an order advising the parties that the appeal would be dismissed for want of subject-matter jurisdiction, as moot, if appellant did not demonstrate otherwise within 15 days. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3. More than 15 days have passed, and appellant has not filed a response to the Court’s May 5 order.

          “While an appeal from an interlocutory order is pending, the trial court retains jurisdiction of the case and may make further orders, including one dissolving the order appealed from, and if permitted by law, may proceed with a trial on the merits.” Tex. R. App. P. 29.5 (emphasis added). An interlocutory appeal generally becomes moot when the order from which that appeal was taken is dissolved. See Reeves v. City of Dallas, 68 S.W.3d 58, 60 (Tex. App.—Dallas 2001, pet. denied); see also Ahmed v. Shimi Ventures, L.P., 99 S.W.3d 682, 691 n.13 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 2003, no pet.) (indicating no necessary disagreement with holdings of Reeves court that trial court had jurisdiction under rule 29.5 to dissolve temporary-injunction order from which interlocutory appeal was taken and that such dissolution rendered interlocutory appeal moot). A moot appeal must be dismissed. See Valley Baptist Med. Ctr. v. Gonzalez, 33 S.W.3d 821, 822 (Tex. 2000); see also Reeves, 68 S.W.3d at 61.

          Accordingly, the Court dismisses the above-referenced appeal as moot. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(a). Any pending motions in this appeal are overruled as moot. The Clerk is directed to issue mandate within 10 days of the date of this opinion. Tex. R. App. P. 18.1.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Chief Justice Radack and Justices Taft and Nuchia.