Laber v. Rumsfeld
This text of Laber v. Rumsfeld (Laber v. Rumsfeld) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 03-2503
STAN LABER,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
DONALD RUMSFELD, United States Secretary of Defense,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, District Judge. (CA-03-170-A)
Submitted: April 30, 2004 Decided: May 21, 2004
Before WIDENER, MOTZ, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Stan Laber, Appellant Pro Se. Steven E. Gordon, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:
Stan Laber appeals the district court’s order granting
summary judgement to the Defendant on Laber’s employment
discrimination action. We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by
the district court. See Laber v. Rumsfeld, No. CA-03-170-A (E.D.
Va. Oct. 8, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
- 2 -
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Laber v. Rumsfeld, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/laber-v-rumsfeld-ca4-2004.