Labelle v. Probate Appeal, No. Cv90 0107896 S (Jun. 24, 1991)

1991 Conn. Super. Ct. 4835
CourtConnecticut Superior Court
DecidedJune 24, 1991
DocketNo. CV90 0107896 S
StatusUnpublished

This text of 1991 Conn. Super. Ct. 4835 (Labelle v. Probate Appeal, No. Cv90 0107896 S (Jun. 24, 1991)) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Connecticut Superior Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Labelle v. Probate Appeal, No. Cv90 0107896 S (Jun. 24, 1991), 1991 Conn. Super. Ct. 4835 (Colo. Ct. App. 1991).

Opinion

[EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.] MEMORANDUM OF DECISION The motion for summary judgment is denied as the rule expressed in Clarke v. Clarke, 178 U.S. 186 applies only to the interpretation, construction and legal effect of the provisions of a foreign will as they relate to Connecticut real estate and not to the validity of the will itself.

Moreover, no Connecticut decision cited by the defendant — appellee extends the rule to the validity as distinguished from the effect of the will.

MOTTOLESE, J.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Clarke v. Clarke
178 U.S. 186 (Supreme Court, 1900)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1991 Conn. Super. Ct. 4835, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/labelle-v-probate-appeal-no-cv90-0107896-s-jun-24-1991-connsuperct-1991.