Labelle v. Probate Appeal, No. Cv90 0107896 S (Jun. 24, 1991)

Connecticut Superior Court

Labelle v. Probate Appeal, No. Cv90 0107896 S (Jun. 24, 1991)

1991 Conn. Super. Ct. 4835

Connecticut Superior Court·Decided June 24, 1991·No. No. CV90 0107896 S·Unpublished

Opinion

[EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.] MEMORANDUM OF DECISION The motion for summary judgment is denied as the rule expressed in Clarke v. Clarke, 178 U.S. 186 applies only to the interpretation, construction and legal effect of the provisions of a foreign will as they relate to Connecticut real estate and not to the validity of the will itself.

Moreover, no Connecticut decision cited by the defendant — appellee extends the rule to the validity as distinguished from the effect of the will.

MOTTOLESE, J.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.] MEMORANDUM OF DECISION The motion for summary judgment is denied as the rule expressed in Clarke v. Clarke, 178 U.S. 186 applies only to the interpretation, construction and legal effect of the provisions of a foreign will as they relate to Connecticut real estate and not to the validity of the will itself.

Moreover, no Connecticut decision cited by the defendant — appellee extends the rule to the validity as distinguished from the effect of the will.

MOTTOLESE, J.

Labelle v. Probate Appeal, No. Cv90 0107896 S (Jun. 24, 1991), 1991 Conn. Super. Ct. 4835 (Colo. Ct. App. 1991).

Pincite

1991 Conn. Super. Ct. 4835 (Labelle v. Probate Appeal, No. Cv90 0107896 S (Jun. 24, 1991)) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related