Labella v. Derr
133 A. 82, 103 N.J.L. 493, 1927 N.J. LEXIS 214
Opinion
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Chief Justice G-ummere in the Supreme Court.
*496 For affirmance — The Chancellor, Trenchard, Minturn, Black, Lloyd, Van Buskirk, McGlennon, Kays, Hetfield, JJ. 9.
For reversal — None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Labella v. Derr, 133 A. 82, 103 N.J.L. 493, 1927 N.J. LEXIS 214 (N.J. 1927).
133 A. 82 (Labella v. Derr) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
MONTREY v. PETER J. SCHWEITZER, Inc.
105 F. Supp. 708 (D. New Jersey, 1952)