Labella v. Brown
133 A. 82, 103 N.J.L. 491, 1927 N.J. LEXIS 213
Opinion
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Chief Justice Gummere in the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Minturn, Black, Lloyd, Van Buskirk, McGlennon, Kays, Hetfield, Dear, JJ. 9.
For reversal — None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Labella v. Brown, 133 A. 82, 103 N.J.L. 491, 1927 N.J. LEXIS 213 (N.J. 1927).
133 A. 82 (Labella v. Brown) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Ristan v. Frantzen
102 A.2d 614 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1954)
MONTREY v. PETER J. SCHWEITZER, Inc.
105 F. Supp. 708 (D. New Jersey, 1952)
Gibson v. Bodley
133 P.2d 112 (Supreme Court of Kansas, 1943)
Leishman v. Brady
3 A.2d 118 (Superior Court of Delaware, 1938)