Labasbas v. Moore

Fourth Circuit

Labasbas v. Moore

52 F. App'x 210

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided December 12, 2002·No. No. 02-1509·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Lillie J.G. Labasbas and Arnulfo 0. Labasbas appeal the district court’s order granting the Defendants’ motion to dismiss their civil action alleging claims under the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO), 18 U.S.C.A. §§ 1961-1968 (West 2000 & Supp.2002). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Labasbas v. Moore, No. CA-01-1906-A (E.D. Va. filed May 16, 2002, entered May 20, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Lillie J.G. Labasbas and Arnulfo 0. Labasbas appeal the district court’s order granting the Defendants’ motion to dismiss their civil action alleging claims under the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO), 18 U.S.C.A. §§ 1961-1968 (West 2000 & Supp.2002). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Labasbas v. Moore, No. CA-01-1906-A (E.D. Va. filed May 16, 2002, entered May 20, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Labasbas v. Moore, 52 F. App'x 210 (4th Cir. 2002).

Pincite

52 F. App'x 210 (Labasbas v. Moore) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related