Labasbas v. Kumar
This text of Labasbas v. Kumar (Labasbas v. Kumar) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 05-1875
ARNULFO O. LABASBAS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
RATAN KUMAR,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. T. S. Ellis, III, District Judge. (CA-05-592-1)
Submitted: January 20, 2006 Decided: February 8, 2006
Before WILKINSON, WILLIAMS, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Arnulfo O. Labasbas, Appellant Pro Se. Jerome Peyser Friedlander, II, FRIEDLANDER, FRIEDLANDER & EARMAN, PC, McLean, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:
Arnulfo O. Labasbas appeals the district court’s order
dismissing his civil action alleging negligence, fraud, and
racketeering claims under Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(1) and (b)(6). We
have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See
Labasbas v. Kumar, No. CA-05-592-1 (E.D. Va. filed July 8, 2005 &
entered July 12, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
- 2 -
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Labasbas v. Kumar, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/labasbas-v-kumar-ca4-2006.