Labasbas v. Kumar

Fourth Circuit

Labasbas v. Kumar

164 F. App'x 452

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided February 8, 2006·No. No. 05-1875·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Arnulfo O. Labasbas appeals the district court’s order dismissing his civil action alleging negligence, fraud, and racketeering claims under Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(1) and (b)(6). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Labasbas v. Kumar, No. CA-05-592-1 (E.D. Va. filed July 8, 2005 & entered July 12, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Arnulfo O. Labasbas appeals the district court’s order dismissing his civil action alleging negligence, fraud, and racketeering claims under Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(1) and (b)(6). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Labasbas v. Kumar, No. CA-05-592-1 (E.D. Va. filed July 8, 2005 & entered July 12, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Labasbas v. Kumar, 164 F. App'x 452 (4th Cir. 2006).

Pincite

164 F. App'x 452 (Labasbas v. Kumar) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.