LaBarge v. WALGREEN COMPANY
755 N.W.2d 185, 482 Mich. 976
This text of 755 N.W.2d 185 (LaBarge v. WALGREEN COMPANY) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
LaBarge v. WALGREEN COMPANY, 755 N.W.2d 185, 482 Mich. 976 (Mich. 2008).
Opinion
Russell LABARGE, Jr., Conservator for Leo Saffaleo, and Mona AlFalahat, Plaintiffs-Appellees,
v.
WALGREEN COMPANY., a/k/a Walgreens, Defendant-Appellant, and
RDC Enterprises, Inc., Lindhout Associates, Architects, A.I.A., P.C., Icon Identity Solutions, Inc., and J.G. Morris, L.C.C., d/b/a J.G. Morris Company, Defendants.
Supreme Court of Michigan.
On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the May 1, 2008 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented should now be reviewed by this Court.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Anthony Pellegrino v. Ampco Systems Parking
Michigan Supreme Court, 2010
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
755 N.W.2d 185, 482 Mich. 976, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/labarge-v-walgreen-company-mich-2008.