Labarca v. Rauf
This text of 14 A.D.3d 597 (Labarca v. Rauf) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In an action to recover damages for personal injuries and for property damage, the plaintiffs appeal, as limited by their brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Polizzi, J.), dated January 6, 2004, as denied their motion for a default judgment against the defendant Irina Belova upon her failure to appear or answer the complaint and granted the cross motion of that defendant to the extent of vacating her default in answering the complaint and permitting her to answer.
Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.
To successfully oppose the plaintiffs’ motion for leave to enter a default judgment against her, the respondent was required to demonstrate a reasonable excuse for her default in answering and a meritorious defense (see Dinstber v Fludd, 2 AD3d 670, 671 [2003]; Albano v Nus Holding Corp., 233 AD2d 280, 281 [1996]). The respondent made that showing. Accordingly, the Supreme Court providently exercised its discretion in denying the plaintiffs’ motion for leave to enter a default judgment, vacating the respondent’s default, and permitting her to answer. Florio, J.P., Adams, Goldstein, Rivera and Spolzino, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
14 A.D.3d 597, 787 N.Y.S.2d 889, 2005 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 560, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/labarca-v-rauf-nyappdiv-2005.