Labar v. Nichols
22 Mich. 200, 1871 Mich. LEXIS 5
Opinion
The controversy appears to be in substance according to the course of the common law. The jurisdiction is clear.
Severens. The record shows that there was, in fact, no controversy as to the account.
The Chief Justice. That we may consider on the hearing of the cause.
Motion denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Labar v. Nichols, 22 Mich. 200, 1871 Mich. LEXIS 5 (Mich. 1871).
22 Mich. 200 (Labar v. Nichols) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Mosher v. Lee
261 P. 35 (Arizona Supreme Court, 1927)
Ogden City v. Bear Lake & River Water-Works & Irrigation Co.
41 L.R.A. 305 (Utah Supreme Court, 1898)
Peckham v. Hoag
52 N.W. 734 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1892)