Home/Supreme Court/LaBar Enterprises, Inc. v. United States

LaBar Enterprises, Inc. v. United States

459 U.S. 945, 103 S. Ct. 260, 74 L. Ed. 2d 202, 51 U.S.L.W. 3304, 1982 U.S. LEXIS 4010
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedOctober 18, 1982
DocketNo. 82-421; No. 82-431
StatusPublished
Cited by46 cases

This text of 459 U.S. 945 (LaBar Enterprises, Inc. v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
LaBar Enterprises, Inc. v. United States, 459 U.S. 945, 103 S. Ct. 260, 74 L. Ed. 2d 202, 51 U.S.L.W. 3304, 1982 U.S. LEXIS 4010 (1982).

Opinion

C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 688 F. 2d 826.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Energy XXI, Gom, LLC v. New Tech Engineering, L.P.
787 F. Supp. 2d 590 (S.D. Texas, 2011)
United States v. Ohle
678 F. Supp. 2d 215 (S.D. New York, 2010)
Michael Spielman v. Genzyme Corp. And Genzyme Development Corp.
251 F.3d 1 (First Circuit, 2001)
Peterson v. BASF Corp.
12 F. Supp. 2d 964 (D. Minnesota, 1998)
Galt G/S v. JSS Scandinavia
142 F.3d 1150 (Ninth Circuit, 1998)
98 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 3108, 98 Daily Journal D.A.R. 4313 Galt G/s v. Jss Scandinavia, Defendant/cross-Defendant/appellee, D & D Services, Defendant/cross-Defendant/ Cross-Claimant/appellee, Crystal Ice & Cold Storage Co., Defendant/cross-Claim Third-Party v. Safeway Stores Inc., Third-Party Defendant/ Cross-Claimant v. Buyers Refrigerated Truck Service of Sacramento, Cross-Defendant/appellee, Can Transport, Inc., Defendant/cross-Defendant Third-Party North America Services, Defendant/cross-Defendant Third-Party A.G. Hapag-Lloyd, Defendant/cross-Defendant Third-Party
142 F.3d 1150 (Third Circuit, 1998)
Lauchheimer v. Gulf Oil
6 F. Supp. 2d 339 (D. New Jersey, 1998)
Navarro-Rice v. First USA Bank
984 F. Supp. 1312 (D. Oregon, 1997)
Crosby v. America Online, Inc.
967 F. Supp. 257 (N.D. Ohio, 1997)
Howard v. Globe Life Insurance
973 F. Supp. 1412 (N.D. Florida, 1996)
Haisch v. Allstate Insurance
942 F. Supp. 1245 (D. Arizona, 1996)
In Re High Fructose Corn Syrup Antitrust Litigation
936 F. Supp. 530 (C.D. Illinois, 1996)
Karofsky v. Abbott Laboratories
921 F. Supp. 18 (D. Maine, 1996)
Gilmer v. Walt Disney Co.
915 F. Supp. 1001 (W.D. Arkansas, 1996)
Quebe v. Ford Motor Co.
908 F. Supp. 446 (W.D. Texas, 1995)
Ratliff v. Sears, Roebuck and Co.
911 F. Supp. 177 (E.D. North Carolina, 1995)
Borgeson v. Archer-Daniels Midland Co.
909 F. Supp. 709 (C.D. California, 1995)
Gardiner Stone Hunter v. Iberia Lineas Aereas
896 F. Supp. 125 (S.D. New York, 1995)
Gilman v. Wheat, First Securities, Inc.
896 F. Supp. 507 (D. Maryland, 1995)
Visintine v. Saab Auto. AB
891 F. Supp. 496 (E.D. Missouri, 1995)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
459 U.S. 945, 103 S. Ct. 260, 74 L. Ed. 2d 202, 51 U.S.L.W. 3304, 1982 U.S. LEXIS 4010, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/labar-enterprises-inc-v-united-states-scotus-1982.