Labankoff v. General Motors Acceptance Corp. (In Re Labankoff)
This text of 472 F. App'x 728 (Labankoff v. General Motors Acceptance Corp. (In Re Labankoff)) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM **
Fred George Labankoff, Swetlana La-bankoff, Ludmila Shpitj, and Shpitj Laban-koff General Trust (“appellants”) appeal pro se from the Bankruptcy Appellate Panel’s (“BAP”) order affirming the bankruptcy court’s order abstaining from deciding an adversary proceeding against appel-lees and dismissing appellants’ adversary proceeding without prejudice. We dismiss.
We lack jurisdiction to review the bankruptcy court’s decision to abstain pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1334(c)(1). See 28 U.S.C. § 1334(d).
We also lack jurisdiction to review the denial of appellants’ motion to recuse the bankruptcy judge. See Greene v. United States (In re Souza), 795 F.2d 855, 857 (9th Cir.1986) (the notice of appeal from a *729 bankruptcy court decision must be filed within the time provided by Bankruptcy Rule 8002).
Appellants’ request for judicial notice and motion to strike appellees’ opening brief are denied.
DISMISSED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9 th Cir. R. 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
472 F. App'x 728, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/labankoff-v-general-motors-acceptance-corp-in-re-labankoff-ca9-2012.