L.A.B. v. B.G.M.

Missouri Court of Appeals

L.A.B. v. B.G.M.

504 S.W.3d 70, 2016 WL 2894916, 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 491

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedMay 17, 2016

DocketNo. ED 102862

StatusPublished

This text of 504 S.W.3d 70 (L.A.B. v. B.G.M.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

L.A.B. v. B.G.M., 504 S.W.3d 70, 2016 WL 2894916, 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 491 (Mo. Ct. App. 2016).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

B.G.M. appeals the trial court’s judgment denying his motion to modify physical and legal custody of the parties’ child, denying his motion to modify his child support obligation to L.A.B., ordering him to pay guardian ad litem fees, and denying his request for attorney’s fees. We find no error has occurred.

No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed under Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

B.G.M. appeals the trial court’s judgment denying his motion to modify physical and legal custody of the parties’ child, denying his motion to modify his child support obligation to L.A.B., ordering him to pay guardian ad litem fees, and denying his request for attorney’s fees. We find no error has occurred.

No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed under Rule 84.16(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

504 S.W.3d 70, 2016 WL 2894916, 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 491, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lab-v-bgm-moctapp-2016.