Laargo v. Cronbaugh

Supreme Court of Colorado

Laargo v. Cronbaugh

8 P.2d 1112, 90 Colo. 286, 1932 Colo. LEXIS 244

Supreme Court of Colorado·Decided February 15, 1932·No. No. 12,870.·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Mr. Justice Alter has not participated in the hearing or in the consideration of this cause. Chief Justice Adams and Justices Burke and Campbell are of the opinion that it should be affirmed, whereas Justices Butler, Moore and Hilliard are of the opinion that it should he reversed. As it must therefore be affirmed by operation of law because of an equally divided court, no good purpose would be served by a statement of the issues or the reasons for the conclusions of the several members of the court.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Mr. Justice Alter has not participated in the hearing or in the consideration of this cause. Chief Justice Adams and Justices Burke and Campbell are of the opinion that it should be affirmed, whereas Justices Butler, Moore and Hilliard are of the opinion that it should he reversed. As it must therefore be affirmed by operation of law because of an equally divided court, no good purpose would be served by a statement of the issues or the reasons for the conclusions of the several members of the court.

Judgment affirmed.

Laargo v. Cronbaugh, 8 P.2d 1112, 90 Colo. 286, 1932 Colo. LEXIS 244 (Colo. 1932).

Pincite

8 P.2d 1112 (Laargo v. Cronbaugh) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.