Laano v. 54 Main Street Management Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Laano v. 54 Main Street Management Corp.

61 A.D.2d 836, 402 N.Y.S.2d 225, 1978 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10301

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedFebruary 27, 1978

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 61 A.D.2d 836 (Laano v. 54 Main Street Management Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Laano v. 54 Main Street Management Corp., 61 A.D.2d 836, 402 N.Y.S.2d 225, 1978 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10301 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1978).

Pincite

Opinion

In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for breach of contract, the appeal is from stated portions of an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, dated October 3, 1977, which, inter alia, provided that appellant Walter W. Pegalis be disqualified from acting as an attorney in this action. Order modified, on the law, by adding to the seventh decretal paragraph thereof the following: "except that Walter W. Pegalis may act as his own attorney”. As so modified, order affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements. Despite the clear impropriety in appellant Walter W. Pegalis continuing to serve as the attorney of record for the other appellants, he may not be disqualified from representing himself in the case at bar (NYS Bar Assn., Committee on Professional Ethics, Formal Opns 1974, Opn No. 353). We have considered the remaining contentions and find them to be lacking in merit. Suozzi, J. P., Gulotta, Margett and Hawkins, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for breach of contract, the appeal is from stated portions of an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, dated October 3, 1977, which, inter alia, provided that appellant Walter W. Pegalis be disqualified from acting as an attorney in this action. Order modified, on the law, by adding to the seventh decretal paragraph thereof the following: "except that Walter W. Pegalis may act as his own attorney”. As so modified, order affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements. Despite the clear impropriety in appellant Walter W. Pegalis continuing to serve as the attorney of record for the other appellants, he may not be disqualified from representing himself in the case at bar (NYS Bar Assn., Committee on Professional Ethics, Formal Opns 1974, Opn No. 353). We have considered the remaining contentions and find them to be lacking in merit. Suozzi, J. P., Gulotta, Margett and Hawkins, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

61 A.D.2d 836, 402 N.Y.S.2d 225, 1978 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10301, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/laano-v-54-main-street-management-corp-nyappdiv-1978.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack