LaAngelo Terrell Woods v. State

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedMarch 27, 2015
Docket05-14-00345-CR
StatusPublished

This text of LaAngelo Terrell Woods v. State (LaAngelo Terrell Woods v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
LaAngelo Terrell Woods v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2015).

Opinion

AFFIRM; and Opinion Filed March 27, 2015.

In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-14-00345-CR

LAANGELO TERRELL WOODS, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 292nd Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. F12-59224-V

MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Francis, Lang-Miers, and Whitehill Opinion by Justice Lang-Miers

LaAngelo Terrell Woods waived a jury and pleaded guilty to injury to a child/serious

bodily injury. See TEX. PENAL CODE ANN. § 22.04(a) (West 2011). The trial court assessed

punishment at twenty years’ imprisonment. On appeal, appellant’s attorney filed a brief in which

he concludes the appeal is wholly frivolous and without merit. The brief meets the requirements

of Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). The brief presents a professional evaluation of the

record showing why, in effect, there are no arguable grounds to advance. See High v. State, 573

S.W.2d 807, 811–12 (Tex. Crim. App. [Panel Op.] 1978). Counsel delivered a copy of the brief

to appellant. We advised appellant of his right to file a pro se response, but he did not file a pro se response. See Kelly v. State, 436 S.W.3d 313, 319–21 (Tex. Crim. App. 2014) (identifying

duties of appellate courts and counsel in Anders cases).

We have reviewed the record and counsel’s brief. See Bledsoe v. State, 178 S.W.3d 824,

826–27 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005) (explaining appellate court’s duty in Anders cases). We agree

the appeal is frivolous and without merit. We find nothing in the record that might arguably

support the appeal.

We affirm the trial court’s judgment.

/Elizabeth Lang-Miers/ ELIZABETH LANG-MIERS JUSTICE

Do Not Publish TEX. R. APP. P. 47

140345F.U05

-2- Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

JUDGMENT

LAANGELO TERRELL WOODS, Appeal from the 292nd Judicial District Appellant Court of Dallas County, Texas (Tr.Ct.No. F12-59224-V). No. 05-14-00345-CR V. Opinion delivered by Justice Lang-Miers, Justices Francis and Whitehill participating. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, the trial court’s judgment is AFFIRMED.

Judgment entered March 27, 2015.

-3-

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)
Bledsoe v. State
178 S.W.3d 824 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 2005)
High v. State
573 S.W.2d 807 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1978)
Kelly, Sylvester
436 S.W.3d 313 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 2014)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
LaAngelo Terrell Woods v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/laangelo-terrell-woods-v-state-texapp-2015.