Laakso v. Board of Education of Hewlett-Woodmere Union Free School District

153 A.D.2d 862, 545 N.Y.S.2d 684, 1989 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11555

Opinion

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of the respondent Board of Education of the Hewlett-Woodmere Union Free School District, which, after a hearing, found the petitioner guilty of certain charges of misconduct and imposed a penalty.

Adjudged that the determination is confirmed and the proceeding is dismissed on the merits, with costs.

We find substantial evidence to support the factual determinations of the Hearing Officer (see, CPLR 7803 [4]; Matter of Silberfarb v Board of Coop. Educ. Servs., 60 NY2d 979; 300 Gramatan Ave. Assocs. v State Div. of Human Rights, 45 NY2d 176), and no basis on the record to interfere with the penalty imposed (see, Matter of Pell v Board of Educ., 34 NY2d 222). Kunzeman, J. P., Rubin, Spatt and Balletta, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Laakso v. Board of Education of Hewlett-Woodmere Union Free School District, 153 A.D.2d 862, 545 N.Y.S.2d 684, 1989 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11555 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1989).

153 A.D.2d 862 (Laakso v. Board of Education of Hewlett-Woodmere Union Free School District) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

300 Gramatan Avenue Associates v. State Division of Human Rights
379 N.E.2d 1183 (New York Court of Appeals, 1978)
Silberfarb v. Board of Cooperative Educational Services
459 N.E.2d 482 (New York Court of Appeals, 1983)