La Varre v. Warner Bros. Pictures, Inc.

24 N.E.2d 850, 282 N.Y. 68, 1939 N.Y. LEXIS 858
New York Court of Appeals·Decided December 28, 1939·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Upon a reading of the record it cannot be said as a matter of law that the evidence does not present a question of fact which must in the first instance be submitted to the jury. The character of the negotiations between the parties, and defendant’s consequent access to plaintiff’s works, together with the basic similarities in the structures of the stories of plaintiff and those produced by defendant, are sufficient to require that the case be submitted to the jury.

The judgments should be reversed and a new trial granted, with costs to abide the event. (See 282 N. Y. 622.)

Crane, Ch. J., Hubbs, Loughran, Finch and Rippey, JJ., concur; Lehman, J., dissents; O’Brien, J., taking no part.

Judgments reversed, etc.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

La Varre v. Warner Bros. Pictures, Inc., 24 N.E.2d 850, 282 N.Y. 68, 1939 N.Y. LEXIS 858 (N.Y. 1939).

24 N.E.2d 850 (La Varre v. Warner Bros. Pictures, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Krisel v. Duran
258 F. Supp. 845 (S.D. New York, 1966)
Robbins v. Frank Cooper Associates
200 N.E.2d 860 (New York Court of Appeals, 1964)
Cole v. Phillips H. Lord, Inc.
262 A.D. 116 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1941)
La Varre v. Warner Bros. Pictures, Inc.
25 N.E.2d 396 (New York Court of Appeals, 1940)