L.A. v. State
This text of 60 So. 3d 508 (L.A. v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
We affirm the judgment, but remand with directions that the trial court correct the adjudicatory order to conform to both its oral pronouncement of April 12, 2010, and the notes reflected in the Case History, also dated April 12, 2010.
Specifically, the adjudicatory order should reflect that: L.A. committed the act described in Count II (burglary of an unoccupied conveyance); a judgment of dismissal was granted on Count I (grand theft of a vehicle); and a finding of not guilty was entered on Count III (resisting an officer without violence). See N.G. v. State, 50 So.Sd 801 (Fla. 3d DCA 2011); Parajon v. State, 50 So.3d 105 (Fla. 3d DCA 2010). L.A. need not be present.
Affirmed as modified.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
60 So. 3d 508, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 5955, 2011 WL 1564004, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/la-v-state-fladistctapp-2011.