L.A. v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

L.A. v. State

60 So. 3d 508, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 5955, 2011 WL 1564004

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided April 27, 2011·No. No. 3D10-2885·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the judgment, but remand with directions that the trial court correct the adjudicatory order to conform to both its oral pronouncement of April 12, 2010, and the notes reflected in the Case History, also dated April 12, 2010.

Specifically, the adjudicatory order should reflect that: L.A. committed the act described in Count II (burglary of an unoccupied conveyance); a judgment of dismissal was granted on Count I (grand theft of a vehicle); and a finding of not guilty was entered on Count III (resisting an officer without violence). See N.G. v. State, 50 So.Sd 801 (Fla. 3d DCA 2011); Parajon v. State, 50 So.3d 105 (Fla. 3d DCA 2010). L.A. need not be present.

Affirmed as modified.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the judgment, but remand with directions that the trial court correct the adjudicatory order to conform to both its oral pronouncement of April 12, 2010, and the notes reflected in the Case History, also dated April 12, 2010.

Specifically, the adjudicatory order should reflect that: L.A. committed the act described in Count II (burglary of an unoccupied conveyance); a judgment of dismissal was granted on Count I (grand theft of a vehicle); and a finding of not guilty was entered on Count III (resisting an officer without violence). See N.G. v. State, 50 So.Sd 801 (Fla. 3d DCA 2011); Parajon v. State, 50 So.3d 105 (Fla. 3d DCA 2010). L.A. need not be present.

Affirmed as modified.

L.A. v. State, 60 So. 3d 508, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 5955, 2011 WL 1564004 (Fla. Ct. App. 2011).

Pincite

60 So. 3d 508 (L.A. v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related