La Societe Française D'Epargnes Et De Prevoyance Mutuelle v. McHenry
This text of 49 Cal. 351 (La Societe Française D'Epargnes Et De Prevoyance Mutuelle v. McHenry) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
1. The demurrers to the complaint interposed by the defendants, were properly overruled.
2. The answers presented no available defense to the action, and were properly stricken out.
3. There is no personal judgment against McHenry for the deficiency, if any, after the application of the proceeds of the sale of the mortgaged premises.
4. The ex parte direction to the Sheriff to proceed with the mortgage sale, notwithstanding the appeal, was proper. [353]*353The proceedings upon the decree had not been stayed by the appeal taken from the decree.
The judgment and order affirmed. Remittitur forthwith.
Neither Mr. Justice Rhodes nor Mr. Justice Niles expressed an opinion.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
49 Cal. 351, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/la-societe-francaise-depargnes-et-de-prevoyance-mutuelle-v-mchenry-cal-1874.