La Societe Francaise D'Epargnes et de Prevoyance Mutuelle v. Beardslee
This text of 63 Cal. 160 (La Societe Francaise D'Epargnes et de Prevoyance Mutuelle v. Beardslee) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
There are two appeals in this cause prosecuted by defendant Warren; one from the judgment, and one from an order made after judgment, denying Warren’s motion to modify the same.
The judgment was taken and entered against’ Warren by his consent. This disposes of the appeal from the judgment. We will not hear an appeal from a judgment entered by the consent of the party prosecuting the appeal. The judgment must be affirmed.
As to the appeal from the order denying the motion of Warren above stated, we are of opinion from the papers used on the motion that the court was justified in denying the motion aforesaid.
Judgment and order affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
63 Cal. 160, 1883 Cal. LEXIS 389, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/la-societe-francaise-depargnes-et-de-prevoyance-mutuelle-v-beardslee-cal-1883.