La Shauna Griffin v. Los Angeles County
This text of La Shauna Griffin v. Los Angeles County (La Shauna Griffin v. Los Angeles County) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FEB 28 2024 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U.S. COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
LA SHAUNA M. GRIFFIN, No. 23-55512
Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 8:21-cv-00981-DOC-JDE
v. MEMORANDUM* LOS ANGELES COUNTY; FRANCISCA CAMPBELL, Administrative Services Manager III; AMERICA RODRIGUEZ, Administrative Services Manager II; ALEX MEDINA, Administrative Services Manager I; ALMA YOUNG, Administrative Services Manager I; LUISA BARRETO, Management Analyst; CRISTINA ROSALES, Administrative Services Manager I; KIMBERLY GREEN, Administrative Services Manager I; PAMELA FONTENOT, Administrative Services Manager II; YVETTE MENDOZA, Intermediate Clerk; ROSA MURO, Administrative Services Manager I,
Defendants-Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California David O. Carter, District Judge, Presiding
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. Submitted February 21, 2024**
Before: FERNANDEZ, NGUYEN, and OWENS, Circuit Judges.
La Shauna M. Griffin appeals pro se from the district court’s order granting
leave to amend her second amended complaint in her federal employment law
action. We dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction.
We lack jurisdiction to review the district court’s order granting Griffin
leave to amend her second amended complaint because the order is not final or
appealable. See WMX Tech., Inc. v. Miller, 104 F.3d 1133, 1135-37 (9th Cir.
1997) (en banc) (dismissal of complaint with leave to amend is not appealable); cf.
Serine v. Peterson, 989 F.2d 371, 372 (9th Cir. 1993) (order) (“Rule 4(a)(2)
permits a notice of appeal from a nonfinal decision to operate as a notice of appeal
from the final judgment only when a district court announces a decision that would
be appealable if immediately followed by the entry of judgment.” (citation
omitted)).
All pending motions are denied as moot.
DISMISSED.
** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
2 23-55512
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
La Shauna Griffin v. Los Angeles County, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/la-shauna-griffin-v-los-angeles-county-ca9-2024.