La Rose v. Geffen

23 A.D.2d 717, 257 N.Y.S.2d 10, 1965 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4672

This text of 23 A.D.2d 717 (La Rose v. Geffen) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
La Rose v. Geffen, 23 A.D.2d 717, 257 N.Y.S.2d 10, 1965 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4672 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1965).

Opinion

Memorandum by the Court. Appellant concedes that plaintiff “rwas entitled to recover some amount for the reasonable value of the services rendered” (but contends that the proof “was insufficient to enable the Court, as a matter of law, to fix and determine the reasonable value of the services rendered.” We find, on the contrary, that the documentary proof and the lay and expert testimony adduced by plaintiff were both credible and convincing and ample to sustain the trial court’s careful analysis and resulting determination. Judgment affirmed, with costs. Gibson, P. J., Herlihy, Reynolds, Taylor and Aulisi, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
23 A.D.2d 717, 257 N.Y.S.2d 10, 1965 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4672, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/la-rose-v-geffen-nyappdiv-1965.