La Rosa v. Barbmar, Inc.

475 So. 2d 1345, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 2280, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 16134
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided October 1, 1985·No. Nos. 84-2774, 84-2579·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The orders and judgment below are affirmed with the exception of paragraph 7 of the judgment of December 5,1984 which is vacated because it purports to dispose of issues which were not presented in the relevant pleadings nor tried by consent and were therefore not properly before the court for determination. Tamiami Trail Tours, Inc. v. Cotton, 463 So.2d 1126 (Fla.1985); Cortina v. Cortina, 98 So.2d 334 (Fla.1957); Robinson v. Malik, 135 So.2d 445 (Fla. 3d DCA 1961).

Affirmed in part, vacated in part.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

La Rosa v. Barbmar, Inc., 475 So. 2d 1345, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 2280, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 16134 (Fla. Ct. App. 1985).

475 So. 2d 1345 (La Rosa v. Barbmar, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Tamiami Trail Tours, Inc. v. Cotton
463 So. 2d 1126 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1985)
Robinson v. Malik
135 So. 2d 445 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1961)
Cortina v. Cortina
98 So. 2d 334 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1957)