La Ronge, Inc. v. E. G. & B., Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

La Ronge, Inc. v. E. G. & B., Inc.

38 A.D.2d 889, 329 N.Y.S.2d 119, 1972 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5255

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedFebruary 29, 1972

StatusPublished

This text of 38 A.D.2d 889 (La Ronge, Inc. v. E. G. & B., Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

La Ronge, Inc. v. E. G. & B., Inc., 38 A.D.2d 889, 329 N.Y.S.2d 119, 1972 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5255 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1972).

Pincite

Opinion

Order and judgment unanimously modified in accordance with the memorandum and as so modified affirmed, without costs. Memorandum: Special Term granted summary judgment to plaintiff for the amount of broker’s commissions allegedly earned by it in obtaining a tenant for real .property held by the corporate defendant. The property is located in Buffalo, New York and defendants reside there. Plaintiff and the lessee are Ohio corporations and the lease was executed in that State. j¡ Plaintiff has not shown that it possessed a New York State real estate broker’s license which would be required if any part of its services were rendered in this State (Real Property Law, § 442-d), nor has it shown that all of its services were rendered outside of this State and thus not subject to New York State laws. (Cf. Gartrell v. Jennings, 283 App. Div. 879.) The order and judgment insofar as they grant summary judgment to plaintiff, for the amount of its commissions, should, therefore, be reversed and plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment denied, without prejudice to a renewal of the motion on proper papers. Otherwise, the order and judgment should be affirmed. (Appeal from order and judgment of Erie Special Term granting motion for summary judgment.) Present — Del Vecchio, J. P., Marsh, Gabrielli, Cardamone and Henry, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order and judgment unanimously modified in accordance with the memorandum and as so modified affirmed, without costs. Memorandum: Special Term granted summary judgment to plaintiff for the amount of broker’s commissions allegedly earned by it in obtaining a tenant for real .property held by the corporate defendant. The property is located in Buffalo, New York and defendants reside there. Plaintiff and the lessee are Ohio corporations and the lease was executed in that State. j¡ Plaintiff has not shown that it possessed a New York State real estate broker’s license which would be required if any part of its services were rendered in this State (Real Property Law, § 442-d), nor has it shown that all of its services were rendered outside of this State and thus not subject to New York State laws. (Cf. Gartrell v. Jennings, 283 App. Div. 879.) The order and judgment insofar as they grant summary judgment to plaintiff, for the amount of its commissions, should, therefore, be reversed and plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment denied, without prejudice to a renewal of the motion on proper papers. Otherwise, the order and judgment should be affirmed. (Appeal from order and judgment of Erie Special Term granting motion for summary judgment.) Present — Del Vecchio, J. P., Marsh, Gabrielli, Cardamone and Henry, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

38 A.D.2d 889, 329 N.Y.S.2d 119, 1972 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5255, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/la-ronge-inc-v-e-g-b-inc-nyappdiv-1972.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack