La Republique Francaise v. Hegeman

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York

La Republique Francaise v. Hegeman

116 F. 1021, 1902 U.S. App. LEXIS 5072

CourtU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York

DecidedJune 12, 1902

StatusPublished

This text of 116 F. 1021 (La Republique Francaise v. Hegeman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

La Republique Francaise v. Hegeman, 116 F. 1021, 1902 U.S. App. LEXIS 5072 (circtsdny 1902).

Pincite

Opinion

LACOMBE, Circuit Judge.

It seems unnecessary to add anything to the discussion of the questions here presented, which will be found in the various decisions in this circuit reported. La Republique Francaise v. Schultz (C. C.) 94 Fed. 500, affirmed 42 C. C. A. 233, 102 Fed. 153; Same v. Saratoga Vichy Springs Co. (C. C.) 99 Fed. 733, Id., 46 C. C. A. 418, 107 Fed. 459. There is no material difference -in the facts. In accordance with the principles laid down in the case last cited, complainant may take an injunction against the further use of the words “Grande Grille,” and against the further use of the words “Vichy Salts,” unless either the word “artificial,” or the words indicating the name of the manufacturers, shall be printed in type as large and as conspicuously displayed as are the words “Vichy Salts.” Complainant is not entitled to recover either damages ■or profits for past sales, and, since neither side has entirely prevailed, decree will not award costs to either.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

LACOMBE, Circuit Judge.

It seems unnecessary to add anything to the discussion of the questions here presented, which will be found in the various decisions in this circuit reported. La Republique Francaise v. Schultz (C. C.) 94 Fed. 500, affirmed 42 C. C. A. 233, 102 Fed. 153; Same v. Saratoga Vichy Springs Co. (C. C.) 99 Fed. 733, Id., 46 C. C. A. 418, 107 Fed. 459. There is no material difference -in the facts. In accordance with the principles laid down in the case last cited, complainant may take an injunction against the further use of the words “Grande Grille,” and against the further use of the words “Vichy Salts,” unless either the word “artificial,” or the words indicating the name of the manufacturers, shall be printed in type as large and as conspicuously displayed as are the words “Vichy Salts.” Complainant is not entitled to recover either damages ■or profits for past sales, and, since neither side has entirely prevailed, decree will not award costs to either.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

116 F. 1021, 1902 U.S. App. LEXIS 5072, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/la-republique-francaise-v-hegeman-circtsdny-1902.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack