La Quire v. State

345 So. 2d 788, 1977 Fla. App. LEXIS 15456
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided April 15, 1977·No. No. 76-463·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The trial judge placed appellant on probation for a period of seven years, which is in excess of the five year maximum sentence permissible for the offense of uttering a forgery. This court in Holmes v. State, 343 So.2d 632 (Fla. 4th DCA 1977) and Heatherly v. State, 343 So.2d 54 (Fla. 4th DCA 1977), has held such sentences to be excessive. See also Watts v. State, 328 So.2d 223 (Fla. 2d DCA 1976), Magnin v. State, 334 So.2d 638 (Fla. 2d DCA 1976). [789]*789The sentence is hereby modified and reduced to five years probation.

AFFIRMED AS MODIFIED.

DOWNEY, ANSTEAD, and DAUKSCH, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

La Quire v. State, 345 So. 2d 788, 1977 Fla. App. LEXIS 15456 (Fla. Ct. App. 1977).

345 So. 2d 788 (La Quire v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Donald & Bales Exterminating, Inc. v. State
487 So. 2d 78 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1986)