La Pointe v. State

106 So. 509, 21 Ala. App. 187, 1925 Ala. App. LEXIS 316
CourtAlabama Court of Appeals
DecidedDecember 8, 1925
Docket6 Div. 849.
StatusPublished

This text of 106 So. 509 (La Pointe v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Alabama Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
La Pointe v. State, 106 So. 509, 21 Ala. App. 187, 1925 Ala. App. LEXIS 316 (Ala. Ct. App. 1925).

Opinion

BRICKEN, P. J.

From a judgment of conviction for the offense of assault with intent to rob this appeal was taken. The appeal is upon the record proper; there being no bill of exceptions contained in the transcript.

Numerous refused charges and also a motion for new trial are set out in the record,, but these matters are not presented for review, and therefore cannot be considered. In order to secure consideration by this court of refused charges, and also rulings of the court upon motions for new trial, it is necessary that the oral charge of the court should be set out in the record, and that a bill of exceptions be included in the transcript. The record upon which this appeal is predicated is" without error. Let the judgment of conviótion stand affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
106 So. 509, 21 Ala. App. 187, 1925 Ala. App. LEXIS 316, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/la-pointe-v-state-alactapp-1925.