La Plante v. State
This text of 268 N.E.2d 327 (La Plante v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Concur: Chief Judge Fuld and Judges Scileppi, Beegan and Jasen. Judge Breitel dissents and votes to reverse in the following memorandum: I dissent and vote to reverse and reinstate the judgment of the Court of Claims on the ground that on all the circumstances the trial court properly found as a fact with respect to this senile, disoriented, physically-feeble patient that bedside rails were required and that his accident would not or could not happen unless there were no side rails. Whether decedent sustained his accident falling from the bed and crawled away, or fell some distance from his bed, is not material. In either event, the accident would not have happened if he had been protected by side rails. Taking no part: Judges Burke and Gibson.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
268 N.E.2d 327, 28 N.Y.2d 575, 319 N.Y.S.2d 614, 1971 N.Y. LEXIS 1584, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/la-plante-v-state-ny-1971.