La Pena v. Grigas
This text of 146 F. App'x 208 (La Pena v. Grigas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM
Frank Ralph La Pena, a Nevada state prisoner, appeals the district court’s July 7, 2004, order denying three motions. Because the district court’s order was an interlocutory order not subject to immediate appellate review, and La Pena does not contend that any applicable exception to the final judgment rule applies, we dismiss this for lack of jurisdiction. See 28 U.S.C. § 1291; see also United States v. Austin, 416 F.3d 1016, 1019 (9th Cir.2005). La Pena’s motion to proceed in forma pauper-is is denied as moot.
DISMISSED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
146 F. App'x 208, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/la-pena-v-grigas-ca9-2005.