La Page v. Blake

175 A.D.2d 622, 573 N.Y.S.2d 942, 1991 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10151
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJuly 12, 1991
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 175 A.D.2d 622 (La Page v. Blake) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
La Page v. Blake, 175 A.D.2d 622, 573 N.Y.S.2d 942, 1991 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10151 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1991).

Opinion

— Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: Respondent appeals from an order of support based upon a prior order of filiation. He contends that the evidence of paternity was insufficient and that the court erred in denying his motion to reopen the proof for expert testimony challenging the HLA test result.

The evidence of paternity, without regard to the HLA test, was clear and convincing based upon the hospital records and petitioner’s testimony, which the court found credible (see, [623]*623Matter of Commissioner of Social Servs. v Philip De G., 59 NY2d 137; Matter of Bradley W. v Mary Ann N., 115 AD2d 268, appeal withdrawn 67 NY2d 938). Therefore, the court did not abuse its discretion in denying respondent’s motion to reopen the proof. (Appeal from Order of Monroe County Family Court, Bonadio, J. — Paternity.) Present — Callahan, J. P., Doerr, Denman, Green and Lowery, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Sutton v. Scheidt
750 N.E.2d 1184 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2001)
Vickers v. Howe
704 N.E.2d 344 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 1998)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
175 A.D.2d 622, 573 N.Y.S.2d 942, 1991 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10151, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/la-page-v-blake-nyappdiv-1991.