La France Decorative Fabrics, Inc. v. Goldfarb

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

La France Decorative Fabrics, Inc. v. Goldfarb

5 A.D.2d 980, 175 N.Y.S.2d 1017, 1958 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6338

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 10, 1958

StatusPublished

This text of 5 A.D.2d 980 (La France Decorative Fabrics, Inc. v. Goldfarb) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

La France Decorative Fabrics, Inc. v. Goldfarb, 5 A.D.2d 980, 175 N.Y.S.2d 1017, 1958 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6338 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1958).

Pincite

Opinion

Order denying defendant’s motion to vacate plaintiff’s notice to examine defendant before trial modified, on the law and in the exercise of discretion, to eliminate the items of examination and to provide that the examination proceed with respect to the relevant material allegations of fact put in issue by the pleadings in the action, as provided by rule 121-a of the Rules of Civil Practice, as last amended, with $20 costs and disbursements to plaintiff-respondent. It is not necessary to consider the objections to the items of examination, since in the light of the recent amendment to rule 121-a the examination may proceed thereunder. Apart from the items the orders at Special Term were properly made. Settle order. Order unanimously affirmed, with costs to the respondent.

Concur — Botein, P. J., Breitel, Rabin, Frank and Bastow, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order denying defendant’s motion to vacate plaintiff’s notice to examine defendant before trial modified, on the law and in the exercise of discretion, to eliminate the items of examination and to provide that the examination proceed with respect to the relevant material allegations of fact put in issue by the pleadings in the action, as provided by rule 121-a of the Rules of Civil Practice, as last amended, with $20 costs and disbursements to plaintiff-respondent. It is not necessary to consider the objections to the items of examination, since in the light of the recent amendment to rule 121-a the examination may proceed thereunder. Apart from the items the orders at Special Term were properly made. Settle order. Order unanimously affirmed, with costs to the respondent.

Concur — Botein, P. J., Breitel, Rabin, Frank and Bastow, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

5 A.D.2d 980, 175 N.Y.S.2d 1017, 1958 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6338, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/la-france-decorative-fabrics-inc-v-goldfarb-nyappdiv-1958.