La Fourrure v. Newman

150 A.D. 920, 134 N.Y.S. 1087
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided May 15, 1912·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Scott, J.:

The plaintiff seeks the examination of defendant for the purpose of establishing the allegations of the amended complaint and reply. The burden rests upon it of proving these allegations and it is entitled to do so by any legal evidence, including the testimony of the defendant, if the evidence can be extracted from him. It is no answer to say that the plaintiff can prove its allegations otherwise. It has the right to prove them by defendant, if it elects to do so. The order appealed from should be reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion denied, with ten dollars costs. Ingraham, P. J., McLaughlin, Clarke and Dowling, JJ., concurred. Order reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion denied, with ten dollars costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

La Fourrure v. Newman, 150 A.D. 920, 134 N.Y.S. 1087 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1912).

150 A.D. 920 (La Fourrure v. Newman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hempel v. Heckscher
131 Misc. 91 (New York Supreme Court, 1928)
Albanos v. News Syndicate Co.
130 Misc. 566 (New York Supreme Court, 1927)